Search
Okay, I have 13 reviews on this site, 8 of them are favorable, 5 of them, not so great. Is that unusual??
Maybe it's because the first provider I seen set the bar too high, maybe my expectations are not realistic.
I expect a session with a provider to be a sexual fantasy, not just a roll in the hay, isn't that what sw's and amp's are for. I expect a provider to be clean, fresh, sexy in her personality, demeanor and performance, is that asking too much???
Yes I'm disapointed when I show up and a provider looks and is dressed as though they are cleaning house or rakeing leaves. also I'm disapointed when I read other reviews about how nice a girl looks and I find that's it's not true.
This is a fantasy for me, I don't like the experiences with girls that are an average roll in the hay, I have had plenty of that in the real world!!
You go boy !
It's not necessarily unusual Tony, it is just a representation of your experiences from your point of view.
Okay, I have 13 reviews on this site, 8 of them are favorable, 5 of them, not so great. Is that unusual??
Maybe it's because the first provider I seen set the bar too high, maybe my expectations are not realistic.
I expect a session with a provider to be a sexual fantasy, not just a roll in the hay, isn't that what sw's and amp's are for. I expect a provider to be clean, fresh, sexy in her personality, demeanor and performance, is that asking too much???
Yes I'm disapointed when I show up and a provider looks and is dressed as though they are cleaning house or rakeing leaves. also I'm disapointed when I read other reviews about how nice a girl looks and I find that's it's not true.
This is a fantasy for me, I don't like the experiences with girls that are an average roll in the hay, I have had plenty of that in the real world!!
How are you "under fire" though?
__________________
I'm retired. Available for references for limited time. To verified, reputable providers only. Permission from the client requesting the reference is required. Emails only - virginiainphx@gmail.com
Okay, I have 13 reviews on this site, 8 of them are favorable, 5 of them, not so great. Is that unusual??
Maybe it's because the first provider I seen set the bar too high, maybe my expectations are not realistic.
I expect a session with a provider to be a sexual fantasy, not just a roll in the hay, isn't that what sw's and amp's are for. I expect a provider to be clean, fresh, sexy in her personality, demeanor and performance, is that asking too much???
Yes I'm disapointed when I show up and a provider looks and is dressed as though they are cleaning house or rakeing leaves. also I'm disapointed when I read other reviews about how nice a girl looks and I find that's it's not true.
This is a fantasy for me, I don't like the experiences with girls that are an average roll in the hay, I have had plenty of that in the real world!!
How are you "under fire" though?
__________________
I'm retired. Available for references for limited time. To verified, reputable providers only. Permission from the client requesting the reference is required. Emails only - virginiainphx@gmail.com
Sweet Tony,
I am sorry for the bad exsperience you went through. If you were in Florida. You surely wouldn't be disappointed. Just remember,never judge a book by its cover. Barbies mprovide as well as a cute girl look. Some times even better. I wish you the best my dear.
I understand the post subject. Still trying to stay as objective as possible - but, I will say that I have never seen a true professional provider go out of her way to jump a hobbyist for his review on a forum before. Especially since this site allows for comments on any review itself and multiple comments were made by both parties. It is real simple for guys, we can choose to believe the OP based on his comments and/or weight of his reviews - or - we can choose to believe her based on her comments and the weight of her other reviews.
@ Tony - The bigger question is why do you care? I take lots of heat for what I post, sometimes it is deserved and sometimes it is a pissant nibbling at my heels. If I am wrong, I say so and move on. If I am right, I have some fun with the pissant, but ultimately I still move on. The only real trick is seeing where I was wrong before I go off on what I viewed as a pissant retort.
With respect to reviews - my last review I did on the oThER board a long time ago was what I thought a glowing recco. Ironically, it was one of the best scores I ever gave. But I was taken to task by the agency because I wrote she looked a little older in person than she did in her pic but that her body was spot on to her pics. The agency had told me the girl's real age. and felt I betrayed their confidence with my comments. I told them they were out of line insofar as I never mentioned any specific age and that I had actually given a very positive recco. One thing lead to another and we agreed it best if I not saw anymore of their ladies. I have since come to understand the angst simply was and is not worth it.
Of course, I never had anyone pursue me onto a forum, but you are not going to last if you let a provider get to you like this. And since she is no doubt reading this, the reverse is true as well that no hobbyist will last posting fake reviews. My "opinion" is that this is not the case here though.
@ Tony - The bigger question is why do you care? I take lots of heat for what I post, sometimes it is deserved and sometimes it is a pissant nibbling at my heels. If I am wrong, I say so and move on. If I am right, I have some fun with the pissant, but ultimately I still move on. The only real trick is seeing where I was wrong before I go off on what I viewed as a pissant retort.
coyote, I think your comment is correct with the info you have, however; there was a post by another hobbyist yesterday on my local forum (Indianpolis) questioning my validity and then I received a pm from NR admin earlier, it was basically a query as to validate me and my reviews as they had said a couple providers have been raising hell with them about me, they didn't specify who. I'm sure we both know who one is. any way i responded with more personal info than I ever imagined giving to anyone on this site, i gave them the info necessary to reference me with all the providers I've seen, they responded after a few hours and said that they are standing by me, "for now".
I know this is an anomnymous site, however; for some reason I am still slighted by being called a fake!!
How are you "under fire" though?
See previous response to coyote
Tony, all I can say is you and I have corresponded any information you have given me had been spot on. If you need any info about anyone that I've seen feel free to ask and I will be up front and honest with you as you have with me.
As for anyone who questions Tony's validity or his truth in reviews I will stand beside him.
your reviews are fair and varied from what ive read. Your ratings are tough however again they seem fair since any rating system is subjective.
why anyone would think they are fake is simply unfathomable to me personally.
@Tony -you can be an honest man or you can be popular. But you can't be both. People don't like to hear the truth as much as they say they do.
You have an enviable perspective and your budget is bigger than the other boys'. You can afford a disappointing encounter easier than most. Your reviews lack an over-inflated sense of self. No wonder you're catching flak for your reviews. They make it hard for people to believe what they want to believe.
__________________
I'm retired. Available for references for limited time. To verified, reputable providers only. Permission from the client requesting the reference is required. Emails only - virginiainphx@gmail.com
I think that this board let's you give more of a honest review and that is something you learn that you can say how it really went for you and you only.
When i first started giving reviews on The Other Board i got rejected for giving a review that did not rave about the provider, and this happened more then once.
I think your reviews are fair, but i also think your expatiation might be higher than others.
...I think your reviews are fair, but i also think your expatiation might be higher than others.
Expatiation - had to look it up. To enlarge on a topic in detail, to wander about or digress. I thought I had the corner on digression, Moebius clearly has the corner on wandering about (the cad
) and as for enlarging on a topic - not sure about the the topic part, but when you get right down to it, isn't enlargement the whole goal in hobbying? (at least for the guy.)
Course won't I look silly if there is another definition of which I not aware.
...I think your reviews are fair, but i also think your expatiation might be higher than others.
Expatiation - had to look it up. To enlarge on a topic in detail, to wander about or digress. I thought I had the corner on digression, Moebius clearly has the corner on wandering about (the cad
) and as for enlarging on a topic - not sure about the the topic part, but when you get right down to it, isn't enlargement the whole goal in hobbying? (at least for the guy.)
Course won't I look silly if there is another definition of which I not aware.
"expatiation" from the context i believe he means expectations.
...I think your reviews are fair, but i also think your expatiation might be higher than others.
Expatiation - had to look it up. To enlarge on a topic in detail, to wander about or digress. I thought I had the corner on digression, Moebius clearly has the corner on wandering about (the cad
) and as for enlarging on a topic - not sure about the the topic part, but when you get right down to it, isn't enlargement the whole goal in hobbying? (at least for the guy.)
Course won't I look silly if there is another definition of which I not aware.
"expatiation" from the context i believe he means expectations.
Oh, nevermind then
No professional provider minds a fair assessment, even if it ends up seeming like a negative review. (my preference is that if the reviewer mentions that I look my advertised age, and that my description is accurate, and that i did what i promised to provide, its all good. If they didn't enjoy what I advertise and promise, and provided, that then is their problem, not mine lol. I do all that I can possibly do to let any new caller know what to expect, if they try to read something else into that I cannot be responsible for that) If the reviewer ends up seeing a provider who does not meet their expectations, that is different from a reviewer who tries to trash her because she is not and never was his type. I think most readers can tell the difference between someone who is fair and someone who has gone over the top.
If you chose to see a bbw and you have never seen one, and have only seen spinners, then as long as the bbw performed as per ads, and looked as per ads, and all the other things, then it is not fair to list all the ways she disappointed you because she is not a 22 year old skinny model. In the end, that kind of thing is what makes a reviewer less credible and less believable, because it then becomes clear he isn't making an effort to find providers to his taste, and seems unreasonably harsh having seen someone who never did anything wrong, just the misfortune to not be his type.
Okay, I have 13 reviews on this site, 8 of them are favorable, 5 of them, not so great. Is that unusual??
Maybe it's because the first provider I seen set the bar too high, maybe my expectations are not realistic.
I expect a session with a provider to be a sexual fantasy, not just a roll in the hay, isn't that what sw's and amp's are for. I expect a provider to be clean, fresh, sexy in her personality, demeanor and performance, is that asking too much???
Yes I'm disapointed when I show up and a provider looks and is dressed as though they are cleaning house or rakeing leaves. also I'm disapointed when I read other reviews about how nice a girl looks and I find that's it's not true.
This is a fantasy for me, I don't like the experiences with girls that are an average roll in the hay, I have had plenty of that in the real world!!
Okay, I have 13 reviews on this site, 8 of them are favorable, 5 of them, not so great. Is that unusual??
Maybe it's because the first provider I seen set the bar too high, maybe my expectations are not realistic.
I expect a session with a provider to be a sexual fantasy, not just a roll in the hay, isn't that what sw's and amp's are for. I expect a provider to be clean, fresh, sexy in her personality, demeanor and performance, is that asking too much???
Yes I'm disapointed when I show up and a provider looks and is dressed as though they are cleaning house or rakeing leaves. also I'm disapointed when I read other reviews about how nice a girl looks and I find that's it's not true.
This is a fantasy for me, I don't like the experiences with girls that are an average roll in the hay, I have had plenty of that in the real world!!
Take road trip mr indy, I promise best experience ever. I take pride in makin you r fantasies reality. Kisses dani
Take road trip mr indy, I promise best experience ever. I take pride in makin you r fantasies reality. Kisses dani
OT FYI to Dani. You have two profiles on NR. At least one of them uses a single stock photo. The lady in the profile pic appears to be AA. That raises flags with guys, especially given pics on your other profile. Only one of those profiles has reviews. Suggest you contact Admin and get one removed. I can report, but would probably be better coming from you as I am not in your area. BTW - welcome.
PS - If anyone is thinking I am suggesting some hanky-panky here, I am not. I do not know Dani and pretty sure that stock photo used to be a default one if a profile was created sans photo. Nothing negative implied, just trying to be helpful - who knows, perhaps she might be into the green skinned orion slave girl fantasty
No professional provider minds a fair assessment, even if it ends up seeming like a negative review. (my preference is that if the reviewer mentions that I look my advertised age, and that my description is accurate, and that i did what i promised to provide, its all good. If they didn't enjoy what I advertise and promise, and provided, that then is their problem, not mine lol. I do all that I can possibly do to let any new caller know what to expect, if they try to read something else into that I cannot be responsible for that) If the reviewer ends up seeing a provider who does not meet their expectations, that is different from a reviewer who tries to trash her because she is not and never was his type. I think most readers can tell the difference between someone who is fair and someone who has gone over the top.
If you chose to see a bbw and you have never seen one, and have only seen spinners, then as long as the bbw performed as per ads, and looked as per ads, and all the other things, then it is not fair to list all the ways she disappointed you because she is not a 22 year old skinny model. In the end, that kind of thing is what makes a reviewer less credible and less believable, because it then becomes clear he isn't making an effort to find providers to his taste, and seems unreasonably harsh having seen someone who never did anything wrong, just the misfortune to not be his type.
Katrina, U R spot on.......I do think some of these reviewers have choosen girls not their type, then complain. I don't ever complain about my reviews, I actually ask ppl to not review me or at least only the basics so that ppl know what to expect but I don't like the details out there for anyone with a computer to just click. I really would like it if the reviews were written somewhere that only members who have been verified could read...
But when the guys say things like I heard yesterday, she had pancake tits...I think that's wrong.We all have insecurities & none of us have perfect 10 bodies (givin guys the variety/price), even the models r self conscious & some of the things said jus maybe should b worded differently, it can really effect a providers porformance & her mentality, if she was: the girl in the pic, correct age, & provided what she promised...some of these guys just got to say something negative about the experience, I saw wher a guy who attacked the girls location (& some of hav to move around every few weeks/mths, for safety). I advised a guy yesterday who the provider confessed cuz she knew him a long time that she was using meth...I asked him not to put that in the review, IMO I just felt that no one else should know about it, at least not on an open review for any le to read, he was so negative with everything about her, his reason cuz he was her reg. 3yrs ago & this time she jus didn't meet his high exspectations...he complained about everything frm her looks right down to her location....Really now we are subjected to the citys lack of upkeep as all the new businesses are building outside the outter belt (& we stay inside the belt for easy access & the fact that alot of newer hotels in those areas will not tolerate us having many guests over)
I've seen many guys who just walk in with a negative attitude about how the session is going to go (leaves me wonderin who r they to come in & ruin my day), & it's really hard to please these guys, in the bac of my mind I know this is the guy who is going to write a review (which he waits 3mths to hide who is really is), but I don't ever bother him about it, smart men know we can't please everyone....I always tell my clients it's a personality thing & really that is what makes a session go good or bad, I had a awesome young guy last night (he knew I just had the worse exp with a client & I was in such a horrible mood)but our time was so awesome!!! I enjoy myself when I can make someone so happy & I can feel them getting in to it, not just laying there expecting me to do everything to please him, we wer in a groove(he knew my reviews so he knew what was up) but he was open minded & we both had a great time.
But I have seen many times when providers get a negative review go after the guy, sending non-stop threatening emails, going on the boards saying the guy is part of a group out to get her...this happens alot where I live...My regs. get more upset than I do when I recieve a negative review & their surprised I let it go...
Sorry I'm talking, I'm bored today...with life....
Take road trip mr indy, I promise best experience ever. I take pride in makin you r fantasies reality. Kisses dani
I think your tits are too big for my liking
A review is about your personal experience. As long as you really saw that provider, it doesn't really matter what others think.
I have paid attention to your reviews, even before I came to the forums, simply because I saw how tough your standards were, and if you give a good review - it is really saying a lot.
Keep being honest... This forum gives the illusion of a team sport, however it is the exact opposite... You like what you like.
Skyler,
I have to disagree at least on one part if you no for a fact that the provider was/is on meth i think he should put that in a review. I can guarantee if i knew i would not see her.
Skyler,
I have to disagree at least on one part if you no for a fact that the provider was/is on meth i think he should put that in a review. I can guarantee if i knew i would not see her.
yeah same here, hard core drug use goes with a lot of dangerous behavior i would want to know as soon as possible.
hell that would prompt me to send a warning to that other site whose mod i absolutely despise.
When you are going to post anything that is possibly slander/defamation, you need to be very sure of your facts. It isn't enough to suspect and report, you should actually be her supplier or party buddy before you can actually post anything that you do not know for a fact.
When you are going to post anything that is possibly slander/defamation, you need to be very sure of your facts. It isn't enough to suspect and report, you should actually be her supplier or party buddy before you can actually post anything that you do not know for a fact.
A little lost on this one - to whom is this addressed or is this just a general comment? If the latter, are you suggesting a false review? As for slander/defammation - you gotta be kidding me. Especially in context of the defense needing to be a supplier (interpretting that as drug dealer) or party buddy (interpretting that as hobbyist.) If the geography is in the US, I wanna be in the courtroom when that case is tried. Lest anyone get the wrong idea - I am all for worse consequences for posting false reviews than a civil lawsuit.
I read her comments in the context of people referring to the provider as a meth user. I think if I could know beforehand that a provider was a hard drug user I would want to know.
On the other hand, and perhaps to Katrina's point, we are aware that some providers/pimps/whomever will get onto boards and put forward false and misleading information about the competition. So in that context, how can anyone know what is the truth of the matter?
Is it really buyer beware, or would you side on safer than sorry? IDK.
I read her comments in the context of people referring to the provider as a meth user. I think if I could know beforehand that a provider was a hard drug user I would want to know.
On the other hand, and perhaps to Katrina's point, we are aware that some providers/pimps/whomever will get onto boards and put forward false and misleading information about the competition. So in that context, how can anyone know what is the truth of the matter?
Is it really buyer beware, or would you side on safer than sorry? IDK.
How about buyer research with reviews being a valid part (not entirety) of that research?
where dangerous behavior is concerned i have to take the position of Caesar, its not enough that the crime didnt occur instead it shouldnt of even been imagined as possible.
rumour or not they would go on the dnc, there are a few on the list because of similar whispers floating around for that matter. If im wrong i can live with being wrong. A good part of the hobbyist mindset should be erring on the side of caution.