Apparently Some People Don't Know Whether They've Had Sex or Not

5 replies [Last post]
High_Roller
High_Roller's picture
User offline. Last seen 2 weeks 3 days ago. Offline
Top Contributor
Joined: 10/02/2008
Posts: 924
Points: 5091
Reviews: 1
(35 points)

So according to the Huffington Post, 485 people surveyed couldn't agree on whether they'd had sex or not. Apparently 89% of people said that penile/vaginal sex is only sex if the guy ejaculates! I used to try that line on my girlfriends in high school (come on honey, just let me stick it in for a few minutes, it doesn't count!). So NR, what's sex to you?

Oral Sex: Yes/No
Anal Sex: Yes/No
Sex with Ejaculation: Yes/No
Sex with Ejaculation but no female orgasm: Yes/No
Mutual masturbation with dual orgasm: Yes/No
Something I'm missing: Yes/No

Let's talk about sex.

But first, it might be useful to define it.

More than a decade after Bill Clinton raised questions over the definition of the word "is," a new study is raising questions over the definition of the term "had sex." If you ask men near the same age bracket as the former president (over 65), 23% wouldn't even count penile-vaginal intercourse.

Research conducted by the Kinsey Institute at Indiana University found "no universal consensus on which behaviors constituted having 'had sex.'" Questions in the telephone survey of 486 random participants asked about different behaviors: manual-genital, oral-genital, penile-vaginal intercourse and penile-anal intercourse. The study also looked at different outcomes and qualifiers, including orgasm in women, ejaculation in men, short duration, or wearing condoms.

For example, 89% of respondents considered penile-vaginal intercourse as having "had sex" only if the male ejaculates. Without any qualifier mentioned, 95% felt that penile-vaginal intercourse counted.

What's the standard for the remaining 5%? Not to mention all those older men?

Perhaps some respondents were in denial, or perhaps researchers were wary of too much information. Either way, the study apparently didn't get that specific. But it did find a need for behavior-specific terminology in certain fields. The institute concluded, "Researchers, educators and medical practitioners should exercise caution and not assume that their own definitions of having 'had sex' are shared by their research participants or patients."

coyote
coyote's picture
User offline. Last seen 4 hours 41 min ago. Offline
Super Duper Contributor
Joined: 02/10/2009
Posts: 1798
Points: 9607
Reviews: 0
(0 points)

Yes to all, except for what you may be missing. How the heck would I know what you are missing? but if you find out, let me know since I am probably missing it too. Smiling

High_Roller
High_Roller's picture
User offline. Last seen 2 weeks 3 days ago. Offline
Top Contributor
Joined: 10/02/2008
Posts: 924
Points: 5091
Reviews: 1
(0 points)
coyote wrote:

Yes to all, except for what you may be missing. How the heck would I know what you are missing? but if you find out, let me know since I am probably missing it too. Smiling

LOL, you're a real character Smiling

moebius8
moebius8's picture
User offline. Last seen 5 hours 43 min ago. Offline
Super Duper Contributor
Joined: 09/25/2009
Posts: 1052
Points: 5569
Reviews: 1
(0 points)

i dont think mutual masturbation counts as sex, more like good clean sticky fun that you should probably shower after engaging in.

im of the opinion that if you can do it uncovered its probably not sex.

PeacefulSoul
User offline. Last seen 26 weeks 6 days ago. Offline
Joined: 05/08/2009
Posts: 304
Points: 1665
Reviews: 1
(0 points)
moebius8 wrote:

im of the opinion that if you can do it uncovered its probably not sex.

So, let me get this straight if I fuck a lady without a cover it is not sex? LOL KIDDING!

I know what you meant!

Visitor (not verified)
(0 points)

OMG peaceful .

My Account:

Login »
Click here to login to your account.

Register Free »
Click here to create a new account.