20 replies [Last post]
HungWell
HungWell's picture
User offline. Last seen 1 day 12 hours ago. Offline
Top Contributor
Joined: 10/06/2008
Posts: 927
Points: 4838
Reviews: 14
(71 points)

Whether subjective or not, it seems to me like there are two many providers with 5 star ratings. To see whether looks are really that subjective, I thought everyone could rate the following girls from one to five. Let's see whether there's a consensus or whether subjectivity really does rule the day:

[url=http://www.naughtyreviews.com/escorts/heather-los-angeles-white-female-0]Heather[/url]


http://www.naughtyreviews.com/escorts/heather-los-angeles-white-female


http://www.naughtyreviews.com/escorts/pia-blue-st-louis-white-female


http://www.naughtyreviews.com/escorts/laura-seattle-white-female


http://www.naughtyreviews.com/escorts/mysterie-los-angeles-black-female

FlirtyChristine
FlirtyChristine's picture
User offline. Last seen 1 day 9 hours ago. Offline
Super Duper Contributor
Joined: 04/16/2009
Posts: 1043
Points: 5752
Reviews: 3
(0 points)

Ok, we'll bite. In the order that they appear, here are our ratings, we happened to agree - so you can count us a 2 votes.

5
3
4
2
3

Our logic:

The first girl - though cant see her face clearly she looks to have a well proportioned body. (lets face it, at least 50% of "attraction" is held in our faces - pun intended *giggle*)

The second girl, the pose is very misleading, she could almost be a 2 if it were easier to see proportions.

Third girl has nice proportions, (so it seems) and could be as solid and maybe have a prettier face than the first girl, we lowered her to a 4 only cuz we had no idea what her face or her body may look like.

The 4th girl got a 2, not 1. since this exercise seemed to be focused on body proportions, we had to reserve 1 for the truly large women

The last girl seemed to carry some extra weight in her hips. the pic is smaller, she's more covered so judging was tought, better pics could easily pop her to the verge of being a 2.

We did not take hair color, or skin color into account.

__________________

xxoo

Christine & Alex - Married Couple Adventures
Phlirty Phun & Phantasy in Phoenix
www.FlirtyWife.com

Ladies - Get Free Marketing Advice in our NEW Providers-Only Forum. (PM for Details)

standupguy
User offline. Last seen 2 years 21 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 03/11/2009
Posts: 21
Points: -171
Reviews: 8
(0 points)

Not too far off from Christine and Co. Here's my thoughts:

5
2
3
1
3

JohnJohn
User offline. Last seen 12 weeks 2 days ago. Offline
Top Contributor
Joined: 10/06/2008
Posts: 752
Points: 4466
Reviews: 3
(0 points)

Number one looks pretty close to once in a lifetime so I'd give her a 5. Here goes:

5
3
4
2
3

JustaJohn
User offline. Last seen 1 year 10 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 12/02/2008
Posts: 88
Points: 812
Reviews: 2
(0 points)
standupguy wrote:

Not too far off from Christine and Co. Here's my thoughts:

5
2
3
1
3

My ratings exactly. Seems like everyone thus far has the same definition of hot...or at least nobody has rated number 4 as being a 5!

Marauder69
Marauder69's picture
User offline. Last seen 1 year 6 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 10/31/2008
Posts: 301
Points: 1576
Reviews: 17
(0 points)

4
3
3
1
5

Cool

ChefHawkTut
ChefHawkTut's picture
User offline. Last seen 1 year 51 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 06/24/2009
Posts: 151
Points: 1597
Reviews: 2
(0 points)

5, 4, 3, 2, 5

But the funny thing is, we're basing this only on body and not face...since most of these gals hide their face...

ChefHawkTut was here

VP78735
User offline. Last seen 2 years 24 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 07/15/2009
Posts: 3
Points: 130
Reviews: 1
(0 points)

5, 3, 3, 1, 3

FlirtyChristine
FlirtyChristine's picture
User offline. Last seen 1 day 9 hours ago. Offline
Super Duper Contributor
Joined: 04/16/2009
Posts: 1043
Points: 5752
Reviews: 3
(0 points)
ChefHawkTut wrote:

5, 4, 3, 2, 5

But the funny thing is, we're basing this only on body and not face...since most of these gals hide their face...

ChefHawkTut was here

The other hitch is that "chemistry" has a way of clouding our vision, and a 3 becomes a 5 if shes got a great bubbly personality, laughs at all your jokes and loves cum.

We are rating them sight-unseen, and most hobbyists make their ratings AFTER a visit, thus, possibly suffering from the clouded perception of having had an enjoyable time with really dynamic personality - and she aint half bad lookin either. Eye-wink

__________________

xxoo

Christine & Alex - Married Couple Adventures
Phlirty Phun & Phantasy in Phoenix
www.FlirtyWife.com

Ladies - Get Free Marketing Advice in our NEW Providers-Only Forum. (PM for Details)

High_Roller
High_Roller's picture
User offline. Last seen 2 weeks 2 days ago. Offline
Top Contributor
Joined: 10/02/2008
Posts: 924
Points: 5091
Reviews: 1
(0 points)
FlirtyChristine wrote:
ChefHawkTut wrote:

5, 4, 3, 2, 5

But the funny thing is, we're basing this only on body and not face...since most of these gals hide their face...

ChefHawkTut was here

The other hitch is that "chemistry" has a way of clouding our vision, and a 3 becomes a 5 if shes got a great bubbly personality, laughs at all your jokes and loves cum.

We are rating them sight-unseen, and most hobbyists make their ratings AFTER a visit, thus, possibly suffering from the clouded perception of having had an enjoyable time with really dynamic personality - and she aint half bad lookin either. Eye-wink

You are both right although the first girl is 5 stars even if it turns out she had a lobotomy. Whether she actually exists or not is a whole other matter. Eye-wink

dogger
User offline. Last seen 10 hours 26 min ago. Offline
Joined: 04/24/2009
Posts: 292
Points: 2692
Reviews: 8
(0 points)

I have to agree with Christine statment on past looks and body how were you treated, i have seen two different girls who i would not rate a 4-5 but they are alot of fun to be with and you can talk with them and it was ok you are done see ya have a good day call me anytime.
I left one girls house i did not realize i had been there an hour and a half. this puts them in a higher catagory then a 4-5 to me.

FlirtyChristine
FlirtyChristine's picture
User offline. Last seen 1 day 9 hours ago. Offline
Super Duper Contributor
Joined: 04/16/2009
Posts: 1043
Points: 5752
Reviews: 3
(0 points)

Dogger... The "looks" rating should be held to rating ONLY ones appearance. However, we are human, and we maintain that AFTER a meeting it's very difficult to be a subjective and not allow our overall experience to affect our appearance ratings.

__________________

xxoo

Christine & Alex - Married Couple Adventures
Phlirty Phun & Phantasy in Phoenix
www.FlirtyWife.com

Ladies - Get Free Marketing Advice in our NEW Providers-Only Forum. (PM for Details)

blakeofboca
blakeofboca's picture
User offline. Last seen 1 year 27 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 12/29/2008
Posts: 35
Points: 940
Reviews: 5
(0 points)

Just for fun let's change the question slightly.

How do you rate them AND would you date them?

I went to the link provided under each picture and her website if that link was provided in her profile. I went no where else. Was that cheating? Probably.

First Photo
5 No review. Big time LA service. High probability she is legit. Website says rates start at $250. I would call but not with less than $400 in my pocket.

Second Photo
3 Confusing review. The reviewer says the cover went on between the BJ and getting down to business CG. That implies BBBJ, so why not say so. Review also includes a link to her website. Very unusual. I'm thinking self review. I would not call.

Third Photo
5 Newbies, don't do what I just did. I'm assuming this woman has a great face and you should never ever do that. She is expensive. Her link to eros is down. So is the link to her website. She has a great review. This is crazy, but I would call.

Fourth Photo
-27 OMG. This just proves there is somebody for everybody. She has a review that claims she pulled a three man train bareback for $100. And the guy says he and his buddies have been back three times. Beam me up, Scotty.

Fifth Photo
2 The photo makes her look white but her profile indicates otherwise. A review says she advertises massages but for $$$$ he got FS. I'm confused. When I'm confused I don't call.

Sinsational
Sinsational's picture
User offline. Last seen 2 days 14 hours ago. Offline
Top Contributor
Joined: 10/06/2008
Posts: 790
Points: 4805
Reviews: 2
(0 points)
blakeofboca wrote:

Just for fun let's change the question slightly.

How do you rate them AND would you date them?

I went to the link provided under each picture and her website if that link was provided in her profile. I went no where else. Was that cheating? Probably.

First Photo
5 No review. Big time LA service. High probability she is legit. Website says rates start at $250. I would call but not with less than $400 in my pocket.

Second Photo
3 Confusing review. The reviewer says the cover went on between the BJ and getting down to business CG. That implies BBBJ, so why not say so. Review also includes a link to her website. Very unusual. I'm thinking self review. I would not call.

Third Photo
5 Newbies, don't do what I just did. I'm assuming this woman has a great face and you should never ever do that. She is expensive. Her link to eros is down. So is the link to her website. She has a great review. This is crazy, but I would call.

Fourth Photo
-27 OMG. This just proves there is somebody for everybody. She has a review that claims she pulled a three man train bareback for $100. And the guy says he and his buddies have been back three times. Beam me up, Scotty.

Fifth Photo
2 The photo makes her look white but her profile indicates otherwise. A review says she advertises massages but for $$$$ he got FS. I'm confused. When I'm confused I don't call.

For newbies reading, this is the kind of process you should go through before making an appointment with any lady and then some. LOL at the review in the fourth photo. I wouldn't call her but I bet there are a lot of guys out there that would.

standupguy
User offline. Last seen 2 years 21 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 03/11/2009
Posts: 21
Points: -171
Reviews: 8
(0 points)

LMFAO at the review of Laura! Do you guys think that's for real? Probably is, but I can't imagine the provider would be happy about her being known as a BB champion!

JohnJohn
User offline. Last seen 12 weeks 2 days ago. Offline
Top Contributor
Joined: 10/06/2008
Posts: 752
Points: 4466
Reviews: 3
(0 points)
standupguy wrote:

LMFAO at the review of Laura! Do you guys think that's for real? Probably is, but I can't imagine the provider would be happy about her being known as a BB champion!

The funniest thing about it is that the girl's phone is probably ringing off the hook with calls from guys looking for BBFS. As much as it is shunned on the boards, I think there are a lot of guys out there who seek it out. Word to the wise, if she offered creampies to the two guys in the review, she has probably done it a thousand other times and must have a high chance of having some STD or other.

B2BWild
User offline. Last seen 1 year 45 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 02/24/2009
Posts: 60
Points: -712
Reviews: 10
(0 points)

Sloppy seconds anyone? Barf!

turtleboy
User offline. Last seen 1 year 44 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 02/15/2009
Posts: 166
Points: 2439
Reviews: 10
(0 points)

5, 4, 3, 2, 5 .Although sometimes it is more about personal preferrence, for example if someone prefers chubby girls, and she looks like a plus size lingere model, then I can see giving her a 5, even though she is not porn quality. The ratings may be based on the persons level of satisfaction or dissappointment with how the provider looked, and not so mcuh how she would rate in Cosmo.

ChefHawkTut
ChefHawkTut's picture
User offline. Last seen 1 year 51 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 06/24/2009
Posts: 151
Points: 1597
Reviews: 2
(0 points)
turtleboy wrote:

The ratings may be based on the persons level of satisfaction or dissappointment with how the provider looked, and not so mcuh how she would rate in Cosmo.

I wholeheartedly agree with the above quote.

turtleboy
User offline. Last seen 1 year 44 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 02/15/2009
Posts: 166
Points: 2439
Reviews: 10
(0 points)

Thank you. I personally do not find models attractive in a way that makes me want them, so model material is not the description of a 5 for me. I find starving women with silicone implants to not be as desirable, to me, as a healthy natural women, with large natural breast, and heart shaped ass, and a sweet baby face. This is why each individual is asked to rate based on his impression and preferences, and not just one person based on a full body picture on a rating standard established by playboy.

bfuddy
bfuddy's picture
User offline. Last seen 2 years 16 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 09/20/2009
Posts: 28
Points: 165
Reviews: 0
(0 points)

skin to win in my book. If the picture is to elusive I do not call... I understand face blurr but front side back industry standard. Pics look to pro I get a little skeptical. One of the major things I look for is F..S no upsale. I do not want to have to go thru what I mentioned in another post about money and tips and upsale while vulnerable. If the ad does not say that I may call and ask if she is a full service provider and I do not want any games or upsale. I am a gentleman and will act like one if everything is what we said it would be. I am glad to have found this place as I will give reviews when I can.. No prices or hint I may just pass it by as I am not interested in going back in forth of what I want to spend and what it costs for their time. AVERAGE RATES is a good hint or hr or hhr posted fees. How about a frequent fucker program??? for regulars.....
Regards

My Account:

Login »
Click here to login to your account.

Register Free »
Click here to create a new account.