The Falacy and Hypocrisy of "Safety Concerns"

25 replies [Last post]
donnydark
User offline. Last seen 1 year 10 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 01/03/2009
Posts: 208
Points: 1954
Reviews: 6
(84 points)

This is a volatile topic and I find the mid evil attitudes around here fascinating.

To begin with, the entire premise of this industry needs to be camouflaged as an exchange of cash for "companionship." We all know this is horse shit.

Condoms are not 100% effective in preventing the spread of STDs. Therefore, there is a risk involved in exchanging cash for sex with multiple partners-- married partners, mostly over may years.

So before you Kondom Kops and prostitution moralists pat yourselves on the back too much, stop and examine the risk to the client, to his wife, his wife's other lovers, the other hookers whom the client sees, with and the various sexual partners of the multiple escorts and the other clients and the sexual partners down the line, which you are responsible for. Even if everyone used condoms, the risk of spreading STDs is certainly not zero. It multiplies exponentially with the number or participants.

Lastly, if you think that I take this "blacklisting" thing seriously, you need to think again. There are hobbyists who contact me to submit referrals to UTR providers and there are also gents who e-mail me to inquire about providers whom I think they might enjoy. Some gentlemen earn far more income than I do and can therefore afford to see many more providers than I can afford to.

There are non-"blacklisted" hobbyists sharing information and escort contacts with donnydark. We have sex being exchanged for cash, both with and without condoms. ASP's engage in this behavior with multiple clients daily, over years, even decades.

So if you're determined to elect me to being the poster boy for STD "risk," then please continue to do so. Because your naivete, hypocrisy and twisted logic never fail to entertain!
-donnydark

donnydark
User offline. Last seen 1 year 10 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 01/03/2009
Posts: 208
Points: 1954
Reviews: 6
(0 points)

Indeed.

Yes, I just commented on my own thread. What are you going to do about it? LOL

moebius8
moebius8's picture
User offline. Last seen 4 hours 28 min ago. Offline
Super Duper Contributor
Joined: 09/25/2009
Posts: 1052
Points: 5569
Reviews: 1
(0 points)

donny your an idiot however in my zeal to point out your horrible idiocy due to the well established brain rots from the syph you contracted while banging street ladies i forgot rule 14.

so i guess this is goodbye until you write something so over the top and retarded i feel it must be commented upon.
so ill probably be commenting upon your retarded behavior soon.

i kind of hope its the post where you finally admit you and not Steve were banging the Holsteins and making the cow/human hybrid daughters you talk about so often.

Jenna Purr
Jenna Purr's picture
User offline. Last seen 6 weeks 6 days ago. Offline
Top Contributor
Joined: 10/26/2008
Posts: 945
Points: 4954
Reviews: 5
(0 points)
donnydark wrote:

Indeed.

Yes, I just commented on my own thread. What are you going to do about it? LOL

LOL

__________________

Naturally Busty in Phoenix, Az

****************** Naughty Reviews members qualify for the reduced (Incall) rate shown on my NR profile ************

High_Roller
High_Roller's picture
User offline. Last seen 2 weeks 3 days ago. Offline
Top Contributor
Joined: 10/02/2008
Posts: 924
Points: 5091
Reviews: 1
(0 points)

Oh god, I really shouldn't ask, but where exactly do you see "mid-evil attitudes". You wouldn't happen to be a dungeons and dragons fanatic would you donny boy?

Visitor (not verified)
(0 points)

I bet he's got a couple 100 sider di lol
Nothing wrong with that.

It's the other D&D I worry about.

donnydark
User offline. Last seen 1 year 10 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 01/03/2009
Posts: 208
Points: 1954
Reviews: 6
(0 points)

Once again, no one is capable of discussing the topic in question.

PeacefulSoul
User offline. Last seen 26 weeks 6 days ago. Offline
Joined: 05/08/2009
Posts: 304
Points: 1665
Reviews: 1
(0 points)
donnydark wrote:

Once again, no one is capable of discussing the topic in question.

It is because it is the SAME question as your last 2 posts, christ all mighty do you have any other thoughts in mind? Talk about beating a dead horse! Barebacking and blacklisting is getting old already!

donnydark
User offline. Last seen 1 year 10 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 01/03/2009
Posts: 208
Points: 1954
Reviews: 6
(0 points)

I wouldn't want to give you people anything which would strain your brains.

netdog
User offline. Last seen 14 weeks 3 days ago. Offline
Joined: 12/27/2009
Posts: 95
Points: 610
Reviews: 1
(0 points)

DD

I'll try to answer your OP.

I may be reaching but given your argument in the OP you do agree that wearing a condom does in fact reduce your chance of contracting an STD. This I would guess is in relation to contracting an STD while not wearing a condom.

So I pose the following question to you.

If wearing a condom reduces the chance you will contract an STD why on earth or any other planet in the universe would you not want to decrease your chances by wearing a condom?

Hell even if it's only a 5% reduction in that chance I'd still wear one personally, but that after all is my choice and whatever you practice is by all means your choice.

Net

donnydark
User offline. Last seen 1 year 10 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 01/03/2009
Posts: 208
Points: 1954
Reviews: 6
(0 points)

netdog,
I appreciate the civil tone of your message. It is refreshing in this place.

1: First, the medical cartel tends to lie. The idea that you will die from sex is what's known as a Psy Op (psychological operation) and I don't buy into it. Take a look at mad cow disease (bear with me). The ranchers apply a dangerously toxic insecticide to cows and steers as they are standing in lots waiting to be sold. It seems that the act of flinching their back muscles in order to keep the flies off causes the livestock to burn calories. Collectively, this can cause financial losses since the cows are sold by weight. To avoid this problem, the ranchers take a paintbrush soaked in highly toxic organophosphates and they "paint" a line from the skull of the cow to its tail. This chemical can work its way into the spine, affecting the central nervous system and can cause foaming at the mouth followed by death. How do they explain this to the public? The meat industry hires some scientists to "discover" a "cause for Mad Cow Disease." The shill scientists, who are being paid to come up with SOMETHING, invent an exotic germ and name it the "preon." I'm sorry if this example seems a little off, but it only serves as one example of medical fraud.

2: Sex without a condom is more satisfying. People need to use their own judgment on whether to go bareback or not. And people are free to believe the propaganda about AIDS and STDs or not.

3: If condoms are only partially effective, isn't it extremely dangerous to have multiple partners and to exchange cash for sex in the first place? Especially when you are married? Let's say condoms are 95% effective in preventing disease. Why on Earth would anyone knowingly engage in sex with a prostitute or a stranger when there is a 5% likelihood that some nasty disease may be transmitted to your next partner? To your beloved wife? To your mistress? Is this issue a question of degree of safety or is it about engaging in behavior that should be avoided entirely if we are truly concerned about "safety?"

Personally, I choose not to be influenced by exaggerations and propaganda or by the disapproval of clueless idiots who don't know me.
Thanks for listening.
-donnydark

netdog
User offline. Last seen 14 weeks 3 days ago. Offline
Joined: 12/27/2009
Posts: 95
Points: 610
Reviews: 1
(0 points)

DD,

1: Though there are some STDs that can eventually kill you that doesn't mean the ones that won't kill you are ones I'd want to end up with. I'm not super versed in Mad Cow disease, but the only thing I remember from it had to do something with the unsalable parts especially the brains being mixed into their feed and that was what was causing it. However I could be worng, but I get the point you are trying to make.

My goal in wearing a cover is to reduce to the greatest degree outside of not being in the hobby of contracting an std. Deadly or otherwise.

2: Though this is most likely true for most guys I really don't have a problem with the level of satisfaction and if there is any drop off for me it is a drop off I'm willing to accept for that additional protection.

3: So if we as hobbists are already practicing something that puts at say a greater risk than someone who only has a couple partners in his or her lifetime wouldn't you want to decrease your risk by wearing a condom?

I'll use this as an example and it just may be goverment propaganda, but here it goes.

Prior to seat belts and also seat belt laws the percentage of serious injury and of fatalities was higher than after these things were put to use or enacted by law. Now some people will argue that some fatalities are actually caused because you are pinned to your seat and so an impact to that side of the car has a greater chance of killing you. But if there is a .5% chance that wearing your seatbelt might get you killed in an accident and if there is a 25% of you getting killed by not wearing your seatbelt wouldn't you want to wear a seatbelt? I'd much rather have a .5% chance over a 25% chance. By the way the percentages I'm listing above are purely fictional and were just used to make an example.

To take this one step further.

If I were to have sex with a woman who I knew to have an STD and I knew that having unprotected sex with her gave me a 15% chance to contract the std, but in wearing a condom I'd only have a 1% chance I'd opt for the 1% over the 15% chance every day. Call me crazy, but I like to play the odds.

Net

donnydark
User offline. Last seen 1 year 10 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 01/03/2009
Posts: 208
Points: 1954
Reviews: 6
(0 points)

netdog,
I tend to listen to my intuition. In the past, there were women (non-hookers) whom I did not sleep with because I had a vague feeling that I should not. Hookers tend to get tested regularly, as all men should. And I still use my intuition today.

A funny thing, the behavior of the staff that performed my most recent STD test was amazing. I had never seen such condescending, weird, coercive behaviors in my life. I was treated like a three year-old, given an "atta boy" when I said something right and given "intimidating" BS when I did not. The whole thing smelled. And I was given a coupon good for a Hep-C vaccine, which I deposited in the wastebasket in my way out. LOL The whole experience smelled of Masonic, government propaganda/mind control. And I have a good nose for that!

Vaccines are useless and toxic and they also depress your immune system. That is one of the other problems. AIDS was developed in a military lab. It was initially delivered through vaccines in New York and Africa. And the AZT that is being shipped to Africa by the ton is nothing more than a failed chemotherapy drug. AZT was pulled off the market due to being ineffective and toxic. And toxic "medicine" is the norm, so it must have been pretty bad for them to take it off the market! And now they are killing off Africans with it! Yeah, I don't listen to the government. They lie, it is run by Satan worshipers and they want us dead. Not a good source of information about sex, nutrition or foreign policy.

When a girl is super-hot, I don't mind wearing a condom so much. But with the average looking ones, bareback is much more preferable. But that's just my opinion. I respect a lady's request to wear one. I suggest bareback and the answer is often yes. So I return to those, yet I still see some latex providers as well because they are delightful, sexy friends.
-donnydark

coyote
coyote's picture
User offline. Last seen 3 hours 26 min ago. Offline
Super Duper Contributor
Joined: 02/10/2009
Posts: 1798
Points: 9607
Reviews: 0
(0 points)

On March 14, this was posted in another thread...

donnydark wrote:

Well, no doctor, I don't think syphilis and herpes are a given. But I have been vaccinated against all STD's.

On April 1, this was posted above....

donnydark wrote:

A funny thing, the behavior of the staff that performed my most recent STD test was amazing.-donnydark

Whatsamatter DD - did the vaccine not take? Gotta tell you, even a rank amateur troll knows better than to contradict himself like that. You might want watch the radiation from that equipment on which you work, those medical cartels are obviously doing some experiment to mess with your memory.

NetDog - I appreciate your attempts to have an intellectual exchange, but that relies on both parties having some level of intellectual capacity.

Jenna Purr
Jenna Purr's picture
User offline. Last seen 6 weeks 6 days ago. Offline
Top Contributor
Joined: 10/26/2008
Posts: 945
Points: 4954
Reviews: 5
(0 points)

most guys with a moderately decent income don't want to be sued for child support.

not all providers use birth control.

it's a guaranteed 18 year paycheck.

__________________

Naturally Busty in Phoenix, Az

****************** Naughty Reviews members qualify for the reduced (Incall) rate shown on my NR profile ************

JohnJohn
User offline. Last seen 12 weeks 3 days ago. Offline
Top Contributor
Joined: 10/06/2008
Posts: 752
Points: 4466
Reviews: 3
(0 points)
anabangbang wrote:

most guys with a moderately decent income don't want to be sued for child support.

not all providers use birth control.

it's a guaranteed 18 year paycheck.

You're feeding the little troll again ana. Sticking out tongue

donnydark
User offline. Last seen 1 year 10 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 01/03/2009
Posts: 208
Points: 1954
Reviews: 6
(0 points)
coyote wrote:

Whatsamatter DD - did the vaccine not take? Gotta tell you, even a rank amateur troll knows better than to contradict himself like that. You might want watch the radiation from that equipment on which you work, those medical cartels are obviously doing some experiment to mess with your memory.

Huh??? You are one ignorant dumb fuck, aren't you?? The "vaccine" comment above was sarcasm. There is no such thing as a vaccine for STD's. You can't get any more stupid than that, you poor, dumb fuck. LOL

I guess anyone who criticizes your beloved criminal government/medical cartel is going to receive the worst of your insults, right ass wipe? Ha ha ha ha haaaaaa!!!!!!!!!!!!

donnydark
User offline. Last seen 1 year 10 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 01/03/2009
Posts: 208
Points: 1954
Reviews: 6
(0 points)
anabangbang wrote:

most guys with a moderately decent income don't want to be sued for child support.

not all providers use birth control.

it's a guaranteed 18 year paycheck.

I always ask about birth control but thanks for yet another completely baseless assumption.

donnydark
User offline. Last seen 1 year 10 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 01/03/2009
Posts: 208
Points: 1954
Reviews: 6
(0 points)
JohnJohn wrote:

You're feeding the little troll again ana. Sticking out tongue

I'll show you a troll, motherfucker. Go look in the mirror.

coyote
coyote's picture
User offline. Last seen 3 hours 26 min ago. Offline
Super Duper Contributor
Joined: 02/10/2009
Posts: 1798
Points: 9607
Reviews: 0
(0 points)
donnydark wrote:

The "vaccine" comment above was sarcasm. There is no such thing as a vaccine for STD's.[/b]

Drat, I never would have known - thank you for clearing that up for me. And here I thought you had the answer to the rampant spread of STDs. After all, you seem to have all the other answers. (That was sarcasm btw)

I recall you having some comment about being against 'herd" mentality - have you ever stopped and considered that with as many voices as are obviously in your head, that you are your own herd? One would think with all those voices from which to listen, you'd have a little better vocabulary; at least beyond adolescence.

moebius8
moebius8's picture
User offline. Last seen 4 hours 28 min ago. Offline
Super Duper Contributor
Joined: 09/25/2009
Posts: 1052
Points: 5569
Reviews: 1
(0 points)

half of them are under 10 i call those the potty mouth crew, the other half have brain damage from syphilis i call them the guys that run the show, then theres the original personality. i call him "the pervert who sits in the dark and wears diapers looking for a mommy to play with him" aka donnydark.

hes a complex fellow for sure, of course it would take someone of a special talent for stupidity to become the village idiot around here.

donnydark
User offline. Last seen 1 year 10 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 01/03/2009
Posts: 208
Points: 1954
Reviews: 6
(0 points)
moebius8 wrote:

half of them are under 10 i call those the potty mouth crew, the other half have brain damage from syphilis i call them the guys that run the show, then theres the original personality. i call him "the pervert who sits in the dark and wears diapers looking for a mommy to play with him" aka donnydark.

hes a complex fellow for sure, of course it would take someone of a special talent for stupidity to become the village idiot around here.

Village Idiot moebius8, look in the mirror and meet Village Idiot moebius8.

coyote
coyote's picture
User offline. Last seen 3 hours 26 min ago. Offline
Super Duper Contributor
Joined: 02/10/2009
Posts: 1798
Points: 9607
Reviews: 0
(0 points)
donnydark wrote:
moebius8 wrote:

half of them are under 10 i call those the potty mouth crew, the other half have brain damage from syphilis i call them the guys that run the show, then theres the original personality. i call him "the pervert who sits in the dark and wears diapers looking for a mommy to play with him" aka donnydark.

hes a complex fellow for sure, of course it would take someone of a special talent for stupidity to become the village idiot around here.

Village Idiot moebius8, look in the mirror and meet Village Idiot moebius8.

Here DD - let me help since you seem to be struggling...Am too, am not...am too, am not....I am rubber, you are glue - everything you say bounces off me and sticks to you. (Pretty sure you can add the witty obscenity on your own.)

moebius8
moebius8's picture
User offline. Last seen 4 hours 28 min ago. Offline
Super Duper Contributor
Joined: 09/25/2009
Posts: 1052
Points: 5569
Reviews: 1
(0 points)

it's down to "I know you are! but what am i" it's not even trying and that makes me depressed at it's lack of education and ability to overcome adversity.

seriously it needs to go and learn how to flame if it wants to play.

donnydark
User offline. Last seen 1 year 10 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 01/03/2009
Posts: 208
Points: 1954
Reviews: 6
(0 points)
moebius8 wrote:

it's down to "I know you are! but what am i" it's not even trying and that makes me depressed at it's lack of education and ability to overcome adversity.

seriously it needs to go and learn how to flame if it wants to play.

Perhaps you need to lean to step out of the cast of extras for "Deliverance" (the movie's been finished for decades now) and learn to how to communicate. LOL

moebius8
moebius8's picture
User offline. Last seen 4 hours 28 min ago. Offline
Super Duper Contributor
Joined: 09/25/2009
Posts: 1052
Points: 5569
Reviews: 1
(0 points)

lul wut?

My Account:

Login »
Click here to login to your account.

Register Free »
Click here to create a new account.